ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ

This website stores cookies on your computer. These cookies are used to collect information about how you interact with our website and allow us to remember your browser. We use this information to improve and customize your browsing experience, for analytics and metrics about our visitors both on this website and other media, and for marketing purposes. By using this website, you accept and agree to be bound by UVic’s Terms of Use and Protection of Privacy Policy. If you do not agree to the above, you must not use this website.

Skip to main content

Samson Kussauer

  • BSc Hons. (University of Victoria, 2023)
Notice of the Final Oral Examination for the Degree of Master of Science

Topic

The Relationship Between Squat Jump Force–Velocity Profiles and 2 km Rowing Ergometer Performance Across Split Intervals

School of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education

Date & location

  • Monday, September 15, 2025
  • 10:00 A.M.
  • Virtual Defence

Examining Committee

Supervisory Committee

  • Dr. Marc Klimstra, School of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education, University of Victoria (Supervisor)
  • Dr. Ming-Chang Tsai, Performance & Data Scientist, Canadian Sport Institute Pacific (Outside Member)

External Examiner

  • Dr. James Martin, Department of Nutritioni and Integrative Physiology, University of Utah

Chair of Oral Examination

  • Dr. Andrea Walsh, Department of Anthropology, UVic

Abstract

Force–velocity profiling (FVP) provides a practical assessment of neuromuscular capabilities, yet its application to rowing performance remains underexplored. This study investigated the relationship between squat jump–derived FVP metrics and 250 m split performance during a 2 km rowing ergometer test in male varsity rowers. Sixteen athletes (age = 21.12 ± 1.68 y; height = 1.88 ± 0.07 m; body mass = 86.58 ± 9.47 kg) completed a 2 km ergometer trial followed by loaded squat jumps to determine maximal force (F₀), maximal velocity (V₀), maximal power (Pmax), and the slope of the force–velocity relationship (SFV). Linear regression analyses revealed that SFV significantly predicted power output across all race segments (r = −0.54 to −0.82), while F₀ significantly predicted all but the first segment (r = 0.51–0.83). Pmax was only associated with the fifth and sixth segments, and V₀ showed no significant relationships with any segment. Across the race profile, the predictive strength of F₀ increased in later stages, suggesting that force production becomes more critical as fatigue accumulates. These findings highlight the utility of FVP, particularly F₀ and SFV, for monitoring mechanical capabilities relevant to sustained rowing performance and for informing strength-oriented training interventions.